How Founders Should Use AI Without Killing UX: The 85% Failure Framework

What Does "Killing UX" Mean When Adding AI to SaaS Products?

"Killing UX" when adding AI means implementing features that make your product harder to use, more confusing, or less trustworthy paradoxically reducing usability despite adding intelligence. This manifests in three destructive patterns that cause the 85% failure rate.

First, opacity and trust erosion: 43% of users report not understanding how AI systems reach decisions, leading them to either blindly trust incorrect outputs or ignore correct recommendations entirely. When AI provides answers without explanation, users can't calibrate trust appropriately, creating anxiety and abandonment.​

Second, complexity and cognitive overload: AI features often add configuration requirements, new mental models, and decision points that exceed users' cognitive capacity. When 90% of users abandon apps during onboarding specifically due to complexity, adding unexplained AI capabilities accelerates abandonment rather than preventing it.​

Third, workflow disruption: AI features that require users to abandon working habits, navigate to separate interfaces, or perform setup exceeding perceived value never achieve adoption. Users correctly assess that "good enough" manual workflows delivering immediate results beat "optimal" AI workflows requiring 15+ minutes of configuration.

The 85% Failure Pattern: Why Founders Keep Making the Same Mistakes

Research tracking 300+ AI deployments reveals founders consistently repeat three critical errors. First, they lead with AI instead of the problem, positioning products as "AI-powered" without clearly explaining what user problem gets solved. Users don't buy AI they buy outcomes. When AI becomes the headline rather than the solution, products feel vague and interchangeable.

Second, founders skip problem validation, assuming users want AI solutions to tasks they've already optimized manually. A B2B sales platform we audited added AI lead prioritization requiring 12 data fields before generating scores yet sales reps already had a 2-minute manual prioritization method using gut feel and recent activity . The AI was more accurate but slower, so adoption stayed below 8%.​

Third, founders optimize for demo appeal rather than daily usability. AI features designed to impress investors in 15-minute demos often require 45+ minutes of real-world setup and break existing muscle memory users have developed. What demos well rarely adopts well.​

Key takeaway: The 85% failure rate isn't about AI technology inadequacy—it's about treating AI as a product differentiator rather than a user problem solver, and neglecting the UX that determines whether users adopt what's built.

Why AI Implementation Matters for SaaS Founders (And Why Most Get It Wrong)

AI implementation done right creates genuine competitive moats: features competitors can't easily replicate, user experiences that feel magical, and efficiency gains that compound over time. The 15% of AI projects that succeed deliver measurable business impact 25-40% productivity improvements, 30-50% time savings on key workflows, and significantly higher user retention because the product becomes indispensable .

However, 70-85% of GenAI deployment efforts fail to meet expected outcomes, and the cost of failure is substantial. Beyond wasted engineering resources (typically $200K-$2M for custom AI implementations), failed AI features poison user perception of your product, making future innovation harder because users have been trained to expect confusion and disappointment.

The Hidden Cost: User Trust Degradation

When users encounter confusing or unreliable AI features, they don't just abandon that feature—they develop skepticism toward all AI capabilities and, by extension, your product's judgment. This "AI trust tax" compounds: each poor AI experience makes users less likely to try subsequent features, even ones that might be dramatically better.

A healthcare app study found that when AI predictions were inaccurate and unexplained, users reported feeling "more frustrated than before starting," and specifically noted "the AI is unfeeling and robotic". In mental health applications where trust is paramount, poor AI UX didn't just fail to help—it actively harmed by reinforcing negative emotions the app was meant to address.​

For SaaS founders, this means a poorly executed first AI feature doesn't just waste resources on that feature—it contaminates the user base's willingness to adopt AI capabilities across your entire product roadmap.

Why Founders Prioritize AI Over UX (And Why That's Backwards)

Founders face intense pressure to add AI capabilities from investors, competitors, and market positioning narratives. "AI-powered" has become a checkbox on funding slide decks and product comparison pages, creating incentive to ship AI features for signaling value rather than solving problems.​

This pressure creates backwards prioritization: founders allocate 80% of resources to building sophisticated AI models and 20% to designing interfaces users can understand and trust. The result is products with impressive backend intelligence but incomprehensible frontend experiences—exactly inverting the ratio needed for success.​

Additionally, technical founders often underestimate UX complexity because they can personally use complex interfaces. When the founder understands how the AI works and can interpret its outputs, they miss how opaque and confusing it is to users encountering it without context. This "founder's curse of knowledge" causes them to ship AI features they believe are "obviously valuable" that users experience as "confusingly complicated."​

The Founder's AI-UX Framework: When and How to Add AI Without Breaking User Experience

Step 1: Validate the Problem Before Building AI Solutions

Before writing any AI code, validate that users actually have the problem you're planning to solve and that they want AI solutions rather than better manual workflows. Conduct the "Current State Validation":

1. Shadow 5-10 users performing the task you're considering automating with AI

2. Time the existing workflow: How long does it take? Where are the pain points?

3. Ask the crucial question: "If we could reduce this to 1 click, how much would that matter to you?"

4. Identify the real constraint: Is the task actually time-consuming, or just infrequent?

A fintech SaaS founder we advised wanted to add AI fraud detection . Shadowing users revealed they already had effective manual fraud checks taking 90 seconds per transaction, but the real pain was false positives requiring 15-minute customer calls to resolve. We refocused AI on reducing false positives, not automating detection—delivering 10x more value by solving the actual problem.

Pro tip: If users have already optimized a manual workflow to under 5 minutes and perform it infrequently, AI automation often creates more friction than it saves. Focus AI on truly time-consuming or cognitively draining tasks.

Step 2: Design for Explainability and Trust FIRST, Intelligence Second

Before building AI models, architect how you'll communicate confidence, reasoning, and boundaries to users. AI without explainability design fails regardless of accuracy because users can't calibrate appropriate trust.

Implement the Transparency Architecture:

• Confidence indicators: Show AI certainty using percentages or clear labels (High/Medium/Low confidence)

• Key factors display: Surface the 3-5 most important inputs driving AI decisions

• Decision boundaries: Explicitly state when AI works best and when it's unreliable

• Manual override: Make rejecting AI suggestions one-click easy, not buried in settings

For a B2B marketing platform, we redesigned AI campaign recommendations to show: "High confidence (84%): Based on your industry benchmarks, historical performance, and audience size. Works best for campaigns $5K-$50K" . This single explainability addition increased AI feature adoption from 19% to 58% without changing prediction accuracy.

Watch out for: Black box AI that provides answers without reasoning causes users to either ignore recommendations (missing value) or blindly follow incorrect suggestions (creating harm). Both failure modes stem from the same UX problem.

Step 3: Integrate AI Contextually, Never as Separate Navigation

AI features must surface at the exact workflow moment they're relevant, not require users to remember they exist and navigate to separate tools. The "3-click rule" applies: if accessing AI requires more than 3 clicks, adoption will suffer dramatically.

Map your users' existing workflows in detail, then design AI to augment those workflows in-place:

• Inline suggestions: Show AI recommendations within the working interface, not separate windows

• Contextual triggers: Surface AI when users perform tasks it enhances, automatically

• Zero separate navigation: Users never "go use the AI"—it comes to them when relevant

• Maintain context: AI has access to what users are working on without requiring re-entry

A project management SaaS added AI task prioritization as a sidebar feature appearing while users reviewed task lists . As users dragged tasks manually, the AI suggested optimal ordering with reasoning. Users could accept all, accept some, or ignore without leaving their workflow. Adoption hit 67% because AI enhanced existing habits rather than disrupting them.

Step 4: Implement Progressive Disclosure and Smart Defaults

Don't overwhelm users by exposing all AI capabilities simultaneously. Design with three tiers of progressive disclosure:

Tier 1 - Basic (all users, day one): Core AI capability with smart defaults requiring zero configuration. Works immediately but with limited customization.

Tier 2 - Intermediate (revealed after adoption): Customization options surface after users demonstrate 5+ uses of basic tier, allowing them to tune AI behavior to preferences.

Tier 3 - Advanced (power user controls): Fine-grained controls for confidence thresholds, model selection, and override rules—accessible but not prominent for sophisticated users who need them.

A B2B analytics platform implemented three-tier AI forecasting :

• Basic: Click "Forecast next quarter" → AI generates prediction using smart defaults (visible to all)

• Intermediate: After 3 uses, expose options to adjust seasonality, confidence intervals, growth assumptions

• Advanced: For users who customize 3+ times, reveal controls for custom models and scenario planning

This prevented overwhelming new users (90% abandon due to complexity ) while satisfying power users who wanted control.​

Step 5: Design for "Time to First Value" Under 2 Minutes

Users will abandon AI features if they don't experience value within the first 2 minutes for B2B SaaS (5-7 minutes for consumer apps). This creates a crucial design constraint: AI features must deliver immediate value using sample data, smart defaults, or minimal setup before asking for configuration effort.​

Apply the Instant Value Pattern:

1. Provide working defaults: AI should work adequately with zero configuration, improving with customization

2. Use sample/historical data: Show AI value immediately using data already in the system

3. Defer heavy setup: Let users experience value before requesting extensive configuration

4. Make setup progressive: Spread configuration across multiple sessions as users return

A content marketing tool added AI SEO optimization that worked instantly on existing drafts using smart defaults . Users saw immediate value (real-time SEO scores and suggestions) before being asked to configure keyword targets, audience preferences, or competitive benchmarks. This reversed the typical adoption funnel: instead of 20% completing setup and 80% abandoning, 72% experienced value immediately and 58% then completed advanced setup to improve results further.

Common Mistakes Founders Make When Adding AI (And How to Avoid Them)

Mistake #1: Adding AI for Positioning, Not Problem-Solving

The most common failure pattern is adding AI to have "AI-powered" in marketing copy and pitch decks, rather than solving validated user problems. This creates features built for demo appeal that break down in daily use.

How to avoid it: Before building any AI feature, complete the "Problem Validation Checklist":

• Can you describe the user problem in one sentence without mentioning AI?

• Have 3+ users explicitly requested this solution in feedback?

• Does solving this problem move your North Star metric (activation, retention, revenue)?

• Will users pay more or churn less if this problem is solved?

If you can't answer "yes" to all four, the AI feature is likely premature .

Mistake #2: Launching AI Without Comprehensive Usability Testing

Traditional usability testing focuses on task completion and error rates. AI features require AI-specific usability evaluation that also tests comprehension, trust calibration, and workflow integration.

Test for:

• Comprehension rate: Can users explain what the AI does in their own words after using it?

• Appropriate trust: Do users verify low-confidence AI outputs and accept high-confidence ones?

• Value perception: Do users report time savings or decision quality improvements?

• Sustained adoption: Are users still engaging with AI 30 days after first use?

Conduct quarterly usability sessions with 8-12 users where you watch them perform real tasks using AI features. Look for confusion signals: long pauses before using AI, misinterpretation of outputs, or single-use abandonment .

Mistake #3: Treating AI as a Separate Product Area

When AI lives in "AI Labs," "Beta Features," or separate menus requiring distinct navigation, users perceive it as experimental and optional rather than core product value. This dramatically suppresses adoption.​

Instead: Integrate AI features into primary workflows from day one. Position AI as enhancement of existing capabilities, not separate innovation theater. Use familiar UI patterns and terminology rather than AI-specific jargon that creates psychological distance.

A sales CRM made AI lead scoring visible directly in the main lead list (not a separate AI dashboard), using the same visual patterns as manual priority flags . This positioning increased AI score usage from 14% to 61% because users encountered it naturally rather than seeking it deliberately.

Mistake #4: Ignoring Loading Time and Performance

60% of users abandoned an AI feature during loading spinners lasting more than 8 seconds. When AI requires noticeable processing time, poor loading UX kills adoption even if the eventual output is valuable.​

Solutions for AI loading states:

• Show progress and estimates: "Analyzing 2,847 records... 40% complete, ~30 seconds remaining"

• Provide incremental value: Display partial results as they're computed rather than waiting for completion

• Set expectations upfront: If first run takes 5 minutes, tell users before they click and suggest it runs in background

• Cache and predict: Pre-compute AI results for likely scenarios so most requests feel instant

For complex AI operations requiring minutes, consider redesigning as async background jobs with notification when complete, rather than blocking UI interactions .

Mistake #5: Failing to Design Trust Calibration Mechanisms

Users need to develop accurate mental models of when to trust AI versus when to verify or override. Without explicit trust design, users default to either blind trust (accepting wrong suggestions) or excessive doubt (ignoring correct recommendations) both failure modes.

Implement trust-building UX patterns:

• Show confidence levels: Visualize uncertainty so users know when to verify

• Display track record: "This AI has been correct 87% of the time for similar predictions"

• Explain failures: When AI gets it wrong, tell users why and what limitations caused the error

• Enable feedback loops: Let users correct AI mistakes and confirm successes, visibly improving future performance

A financial forecasting SaaS showed not just predicted revenue but confidence intervals: "Q3 forecast: $2.1M - $2.7M (80% confidence), most likely $2.4M" . This honest uncertainty communication increased user trust and decision quality because teams could plan for the range rather than being surprised by the variability.

Real-World Example: Fixing an AI-Powered SaaS With 12% Adoption

A B2B customer success platform came to Desisle building AI churn prediction, health scoring, and automated intervention recommendations. Despite sophisticated models achieving 81% prediction accuracy, only 12% of customer success managers used AI features more than once, and the company couldn't demonstrate ROI to justify continued AI investment.

The Problem: Powerful AI, Incomprehensible and Disruptive UX

Our UX audit revealed the AI was technically sound validation showed 81% accuracy predicting churn 30 days in advance. The failure was entirely in experience design:

UX failures identified:

• Hidden in separate dashboard: AI insights lived in a dedicated "AI Insights" section requiring manual navigation; 63% of CSMs didn't know features existed

• Zero explainability: AI showed churn risk scores (1-100) with no explanation of what factors drove scores or what actions would reduce risk

• Disrupted workflows: Using AI required exporting data, switching dashboards, then manually implementing recommendations in their actual working interface

• Overwhelming information density: The AI dashboard showed 14 different predictive metrics simultaneously, creating analysis paralysis

• No progressive disclosure: All AI capabilities exposed simultaneously to new users with no guided adoption path

Session recordings showed CSMs trying AI once, spending 4-7 minutes confused by unexplained scores, then never returning because their existing gut-feel approach was faster and more actionable.

The Redesign: Contextual, Explainable, Workflow-Integrated AI

We redesigned the AI experience layer around four strategic UX changes:

1. Contextual Integration: Moved AI insights into the primary customer health dashboard CSMs used daily. Churn predictions appeared inline next to customer names, not in separate tools. Health scores showed directly in the interface where CSMs already worked.

2. Explainability First: Every AI score showed confidence, key factors, and actionable recommendations. Instead of "Churn Risk: 78," the AI showed "High churn risk (78/100, High confidence) due to: declining product usage (-40%), 2 support escalations, contract renewal in 45 days. Recommended: Schedule QBR, review success metrics".

3. Progressive Disclosure: Basic AI (churn risk, health scores) visible to all CSMs with zero configuration. Intermediate features (custom alerts, trend analysis) revealed after 10+ uses of basic features. Advanced capabilities (custom models, scenario planning) accessible but not prominent for power users.

4. Instant Value: AI worked immediately using existing customer data—no setup required. CSMs experienced value in their first session before being prompted to customize thresholds or configure alerts.

The Results: 5x Adoption Increase, Measurable Churn Reduction

Within 90 days of launching the redesigned AI experience:

• AI feature adoption increased from 12% to 63% of active CSMs (+425% improvement)

• Sustained usage (CSMs using AI 30+ days after first exposure) increased from 4% to 49%

• Churn prediction action rate (CSMs taking recommended interventions) increased from 8% to 54%

• Measurable churn reduction: Accounts where CSMs used AI insights had 23% lower churn than control group

• AI became #2 most-cited value in customer feedback, up from not mentioned 

The AI technology, models, and prediction accuracy remained identical. What changed was the user experience layer that made AI capabilities discoverable, understandable, trustworthy, and integrated into workflows CSMs already performed daily .

The company finally achieved ROI on AI investment because users could actually access and benefit from the intelligence that had always existed but was previously unusable.

Is poor UX preventing your AI features from delivering ROI? Request a Founder's AI-UX Strategy Session with Desisle. Our team will audit how users interact with your AI capabilities, identify specific UX barriers to adoption, and provide a prioritized roadmap for increasing usage and demonstrating value.

What's included:

• Pre-session analytics review of AI feature engagement and drop-off points

• 90-minute working session with our design strategists

• Live product walkthrough identifying UX friction in your AI features

• AI-UX maturity assessment and prioritized improvement roadmap

• Q&A on explainability, integration patterns, and progressive disclosure

Form fields: Name, Work email, Company, Product URL, Primary AI feature with low adoption
Button: Book Strategy Session

The AI-UX Maturity Model: Where Does Your Product Stand?

Use this framework to assess your product's AI-UX maturity and identify what to prioritize:

Most SaaS products with AI fall into Levels 0-2, explaining why 85% of AI projects fail to deliver value. Moving from Level 1 to Level 4 typically requires 8-12 weeks of focused design work but can increase adoption 3-5x without changing any AI technology .

Key takeaway: Your AI maturity is determined by UX, not model sophistication. A simple rule-based system at Level 5 will outperform cutting-edge ML at Level 2.

How Desisle Helps SaaS Founders Implement AI Without Killing UX

As a SaaS design agency specializing in AI-powered product redesign, Desisle has developed a founder-focused methodology that prevents the 85% failure scenario . Our approach integrates strategic consulting, workflow analysis, and hands-on design to ensure AI features drive adoption rather than abandonment.

Phase 1: AI Opportunity Audit and Problem Validation

We analyze your product and user workflows to identify where AI can genuinely reduce effort versus where it would add complexity . This includes:

• Shadowing 10-15 users performing tasks you're considering automating

• Mapping current workflow efficiency: which tasks are actually time-consuming vs infrequent?

• Identifying "false positives": places where AI seems valuable but would disrupt optimized workflows

• Prioritizing AI opportunities by impact potential and implementation feasibility

For a B2B procurement platform, our audit revealed that 3 of 7 planned AI features would actually increase user effort due to setup requirements, while 2 features had 10x more impact potential than the team initially estimated . This prevented $180K in wasted engineering on low-value AI while focusing resources on high-impact opportunities.

Phase 2: Explainability Architecture and Trust Design

Before your team builds AI models, we architect how AI will communicate decisions, confidence, and reasoning to users . This ensures transparency is built into the foundation:

• Defining what information users need to appropriately trust AI outputs

• Designing confidence visualization and key factor displays

• Establishing when to require human verification versus allowing automation

• Creating manual override mechanisms that users can access intuitively

We deliver explainability specifications that guide both data science teams (what metadata to surface) and frontend teams (how to present it clearly), preventing the "bolt-on explainability" that never works well .

Phase 3: Contextual Integration and Progressive Disclosure Design

We redesign workflows to integrate AI contextually, ensuring features surface at relevant moments rather than requiring separate navigation :

• Moving AI from separate sections into primary user workflows

• Designing inline suggestions, contextual triggers, or sidebar assistants

• Creating smart defaults so AI works immediately without setup

• Implementing three-tier progressive disclosure

For a content marketing platform, we integrated AI SEO optimization directly into the editor as a sidebar showing real-time suggestions . We used progressive disclosure to expose basic suggestions immediately, with advanced controls revealed as users demonstrated sophistication. This design pattern increased AI adoption from 23% to 69% .

Phase 4: Founder Advisory and AI-UX Roadmapping

We work directly with founders to build AI product roadmaps that balance capability with usability :

• Sequencing AI features from highest-value, lowest-complexity to more sophisticated capabilities

• Identifying which AI opportunities to pursue, postpone, or abandon entirely

• Establishing AI-specific success metrics (comprehension rate, appropriate trust, sustained adoption)

• Creating quarterly testing plans to identify and fix UX issues before they suppress adoption

This strategic layer ensures founders make informed decisions about AI investment and can demonstrate ROI to boards and investors through adoption metrics, not just technological sophistication .

Action Framework: Your Next 30 Days for AI-UX Success

Week 1: Audit Current State and User Perception

• Day 1-3: Review analytics for all AI features track adoption rate, sustained usage, and abandonment points

• Day 4-5: Watch 20-30 session recordings of users encountering AI features; note confusion signals and abandonment triggers

• Day 6-7: Conduct 5 user interviews asking: "What does [AI feature] do?" and "When would you use it?" to measure comprehension

Deliverable: List of AI features ranked by adoption rate, with identified UX issues preventing higher usage .

Week 2: Validate Problem-Solution Fit

• Day 8-10: Shadow 5-8 users performing tasks your AI automates; time existing workflows and identify real pain points

• Day 11-12: Ask users: "If we could reduce this to 1 click, how much would that matter?" Separate nice-to-have from must-solve

• Day 13-14: Map which AI features solve validated problems vs which exist for positioning; deprioritize the latter ruthlessly

Deliverable: Prioritized list of AI opportunities based on validated user pain, not technological capability .

Week 3: Design Explainability and Trust Mechanisms

• Day 15-17: For each AI feature, define: What confidence level will you show? What key factors? What are capability boundaries?

• Day 18-20: Prototype explainability UI using simple mockups or even text descriptions users can react to

• Day 21: Test explainability prototypes with 5 users: Do they understand? Do they trust appropriately?

Deliverable: Explainability specifications ready for engineering implementation .

Week 4: Plan Contextual Integration

• Day 22-24: Map exactly where in existing workflows each AI feature should surface; identify current separate navigation to eliminate

• Day 25-27: Design progressive disclosure tiers: basic (all users), intermediate (after adoption), advanced (power users)

• Day 28-30: Create implementation roadmap with clear success metrics: target adoption rates, comprehension goals, sustained usage targets

Deliverable: 90-day AI-UX improvement roadmap with measurable goals and quarterly testing milestones .

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do so many AI features fail despite good technology?

85% of AI projects fail not because of inadequate technology, but due to poor user experience design that prevents adoption. Common UX failures include: opaque AI decision-making that users don't trust (43% don't understand how AI reaches conclusions ), workflow disruption requiring users to abandon working habits, excessive complexity during onboarding (90% abandon due to complexity ), and lack of proper explainability and control mechanisms. Founders often prioritize AI sophistication over usability, resulting in powerful features that users avoid because they're harder to use than manual alternatives.

How should SaaS founders decide where to add AI features?

SaaS founders should add AI only where it solves high-value problems and reduces user effort by at least 3x compared to manual methods. Use the AI Value Framework: identify tasks taking users 15+ minutes manually that they perform frequently, validate through user interviews that they want automation (not just efficiency improvements), ensure AI can deliver measurably better results, and confirm the feature fits naturally into existing workflows without requiring new habits . Start with augmentation (AI assisting humans while they maintain control) before attempting full automation, and prioritize explainable AI applications where users need to understand and trust outputs for high-stakes decisions.

What is the biggest UX mistake founders make when adding AI?

The biggest UX mistake founders make is treating AI as a separate product area or innovation showcase instead of integrated workflow capability. When AI lives in "AI Labs" sections, requires special navigation, or disrupts existing user habits, adoption rates drop below 15% regardless of technological sophistication . Additional critical mistakes include: launching AI without explainability design (causing 43% of users to not understand how it works ), adding AI to impress investors rather than solve validated user problems, ignoring progressive disclosure and overwhelming users with all AI capabilities simultaneously, and failing to conduct AI-specific usability testing that measures comprehension and appropriate trust calibration.

How can founders balance AI sophistication with simplicity?

Founders balance AI sophistication with simplicity through progressive disclosure and smart defaults. Design AI features with three tiers: basic automation requiring zero configuration that works adequately for all users, intermediate customization revealed after users demonstrate adoption through 5+ uses, and advanced controls for power users who need fine-tuning but shouldn't see them initially . Use the "3-click rule": if accessing AI capabilities requires more than 3 clicks or actions, adoption suffers dramatically . Implement contextual AI that surfaces at relevant workflow moments rather than requiring users to navigate to separate AI interfaces, and prioritize instant value delivery (under 2 minutes for B2B SaaS ) over comprehensive setup that delays gratification.

What metrics should founders track for AI feature success?

Founders should track AI-specific metrics beyond traditional feature adoption rates . Essential metrics include: 

Comprehension rate (percentage of users who can correctly explain what AI features do when asked), 

Appropriate trust calibration (ratio of AI suggestions accepted when confidence is high versus rejected when confidence is low), 

Sustained adoption (percentage of users engaging with AI features 30, 60, and 90 days after first exposure), 

Time-to-first-value (should be under 2 minutes for B2B SaaS ), 

Perceived value (user-reported time savings and decision quality improvements through surveys), and 

AI abandonment triggers identified through session recordings showing specific UX friction points causing drop-offs . 

Also track whether AI features correlate with improved business outcomes like retention, expansion revenue, or referral rates.

Which SaaS product design agency helps founders implement AI without UX failures?

Desisle is a SaaS product design agency based in Bangalore, India, that specializes in helping B2B SaaS founders implement AI features without destroying user experience . The agency provides comprehensive services including AI opportunity audits to validate problem-solution fit, explainability architecture design, contextual workflow integration, progressive disclosure implementation, and continuous usability testing focused on AI-specific metrics like comprehension and trust calibration . Desisle has helped founders increase AI feature adoption from under 15% to over 60% through strategic design that balances technological capability with usability, preventing the 85% failure rate by treating UX as the primary success factor rather than AI sophistication .

Take Action: Implement AI Without Destroying Your UX and Adoption Metrics

The evidence is overwhelming: 85% of AI projects fail due to poor UX, not inadequate technology. If you're a SaaS founder planning AI features or struggling with low adoption of existing AI capabilities, the gap between success and failure is determined by user experience design, not model sophistication.

The 15% of AI implementations that succeed share common patterns: they solve validated user problems (not positioning problems), integrate contextually into existing workflows, provide transparent explainability that builds appropriate trust, use progressive disclosure to prevent overwhelm, and deliver value in under 2 minutes . These aren't technological advantages—they're UX advantages accessible to any founder willing to prioritize experience design alongside AI development.

Schedule a Founder's AI-UX Strategy Session with Desisle. Our team will audit your current or planned AI features, identify specific UX barriers that would cause the 85% failure scenario, and provide a concrete roadmap for implementing AI that users actually adopt and value. We've helped 50+ B2B SaaS founders navigate AI implementation without destroying the user experience that drives retention and growth .

What's included in your strategy session:

• Pre-session analytics and user research review

• 90-minute working session with our founder and senior design strategists

• AI-UX maturity assessment with comparison to industry benchmarks

• Identification of your top 5 UX risks preventing AI adoption

• Prioritized 90-day roadmap with projected adoption improvements

• Access to our Founder's AI-UX Integration Checklist and frameworks

Form fields: Name, Work email, Company, Product stage (Planning AI / Building AI / AI Launched), Biggest AI challenge
Button: Book Your Strategy Session

Don't let poor UX waste your AI investment. The 85% failure rate is preventable with expert design strategy applied before users form negative perceptions. Whether you're planning your first AI feature or trying to salvage existing ones with low adoption, Desisle's team has the specialized experience to ensure AI becomes your competitive advantage rather than your abandoned feature graveyard.